Project Name: Daniels Building at One Spadina
Products: Exterior Wall System, ultra high performance concrete: TAKTL, Hollow Deck System: Bubbledeck, Curtainwall System: Alumicor, Radiant System: Rehau, Ceiling framing system: Armstrong
Firm Location: Boston, MA
Completion year: 2018
Gross Built up Area: 14,399 sqm
Project Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Lead Architects: Nader Tehrani and Katherine Faulkner, AIA, Claudina Sula, OAA
Design Team: NADAAA team: John Houser, Amin Tadj, Tim Wong, Alda Black, Marta Guerra, James Juricevich, Parke Macdowell, Dane Asmussen, Laura Williams, Peter Sprowls, Noora Al Musallam, Tammy Teng, Wesley Hiatt, John Mars, Mazyar Kahali, Matthew Waxman, Luisel Zayas, Adamson Associates Architects team: Jack Cusimano, Tina Leong, John McMillan, Martin Dolan, Zbigniew Jurkiewicz, Michael Lukachko, Zale Spodek, Gilles Leger, George Georges, Ke Leng Tran, Riad Djilali
Clients: University of Toronto
Engineering: Building Envelope consultant: Entuitive Corporation
Structural Consultants: Entuitive Corporation
Landscape Consultants: Public Work
MEP Consultants: Mechanical / Plumbing: The Mitchell Partnership Electrical / Data / AV / Lighting design: Mulvey Banani International, Inc.
Contractors: Eastern Construction Company Ltd
Project Manager: Richard Lee, Tom Beresford
Collaborators: Heritage Consultant: ERA Architects Acoustics: Aercoustics Engineering Ltd Civil: A. M. Candaras Associates, Inc. Hardware: Upper Canada Specialty Hardware, Ltd. Select furniture design and construction: Daniels Faculty
Photo Credits: Nic LehouxMore Specs
(Text as submitted by architect)
The Daniels Building at the University of Toronto embodies a holistic approach to urban design and sustainability. As the new home for the John H. Daniels Faculty of architecture, landscape, and design, its purpose is to engage students and the broader community in dialogue about the built environment.
At the center of one of Toronto’s few circular parcels, the project anchors the southwest corner of the University and opens the circle to the public after years of inaccessibility. It restores the historic and forgotten building to its original grandeur while also integrating a new addition. The north-south axis characterizes symbolic relationships to the City, while the east-west axis is activated by pedestrian traffic. On the western edge, a discreet arcade addresses the residential scale of the adjacent neighborhood. Meanwhile, a public plaza to the east creates a prominent relationship with the campus. The renewed site invites activity, with circulation for pedestrians and cyclists. Extensive sustainable features including a noteworthy approach to site stormwater management while simultaneously bringing a heritage building back to life.
The design of this building presented a case where problems of pedagogy come face to face with a physical environment that is inhabited and tested daily by an audience of experts, critics, teachers, practitioners, and students, the very protagonists of the medium. It is perhaps one of the few occasions where the audience is engaging with the building and its authors at a higher level, making it an added challenge –and responsibility– to speak to architectural questions with a greater degree of nuance, as such the building was designed to become a pedagogical tool, integrated into the curriculum with both sustainable/design elements and school programs on display both to students and the public.